Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Memory 74.4 1-Core 82.9 2-Core 147 60% 101 Pts	4-Core 200 8-Core 201 27% 200 Pts	64-Core 197 12% 197 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7500M 12,745 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sony(104D 90AC) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	4.4% Terrible	Lighting 5.67 Reflection 5.65 Parallax 4.47 5% 5.26 fps	MRender 5.19 Gravity 4 Splatting 5.22 4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.4% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 SSD 256GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 182GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 392 400 405 406 405 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Read 423 Write 390 Mixed 334 SusWrite 396 87% 386 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 33.4 4K Mixed 16.9 72% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 227 DQ Mixed 33.8 75% 153 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 71%
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$41 64,201 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 459GB free Firmware: LVD3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 97 97 96 97 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Read 91.1 Write 100 Mixed 25.4 SusWrite 96.7 57% 78.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 1.7 327% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905625-004.A03LF 2x4GB 128 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	55.9% Above average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 18.2 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 16.7 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 91.6 44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 88%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16