Apple MacBookPro14,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple MacBookPro14,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-B4831CEBD52A0C4C
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200616
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 15 '20 at 14:59
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 59%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7660U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 70.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 157
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 278
36% 272 Pts
64-Core 275
17% 275 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Sapphire(1DA2 E410) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 108
Parallax 206
102% 146 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 136
Splatting 157
112% 133 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP0512 500GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 16.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,338
Write 1,621
Mixed 1,534
336% 1,498 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 45.9
152% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 854
DQ Write 778
DQ Mixed 727
570% 786 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 68%
BUFFALO USB Flash Disk 2GB
2GB free, PID 0098
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.9 4.9 5 5 4.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
5.73% Terrible
Read 19
Write 4.3
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 4.9
9% 8.38 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
30% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.73%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4D5435324C31473332443450472D30393320 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
85% Excellent
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 48.2
MC Mixed 22.7
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 17.9
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro14,1 Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro14,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback