Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190918
Uptime3 Days
Run DateSep 14 '20 at 23:31
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 80.3
1-Core 128
2-Core 249
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 721
75% 603 Pts
64-Core 997
62% 997 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
Asus(1043 04E5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 970 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 47.3
Parallax 50.4
0% 32.6 fps
MRender 50.2
Gravity 40.8
Splatting 35.3
34% 42.1 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 73 68 44 48 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
21.8% Poor
Read 12.5
Write 82.3
Mixed 21
SusWrite 63.6
33% 44.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.1
28% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 77%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$72
75GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 71 82 84 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 65.5
Write 69.3
Mixed 52
SusWrite 80.7
49% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
78% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3200C16D4/4GX KHX2666C13/8GX KHX3200C16D4/4GX 16GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 18.6
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 21.1
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Builds (Compare 23,525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $620
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback