Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	81.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	262% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2276M 1,872 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Memory 84.1 1-Core 131 2-Core 248 86% 154 Pts	4-Core 422 8-Core 735 70% 578 Pts	64-Core 980 61% 980 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000 1,190 User benchmarks, average bench 96% Legend(17AA 2297) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 443.17 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	81.5% Excellent	Lighting 98.5 Reflection 120 Parallax 109 80% 109 fps	MRender 135 Gravity 93.5 Splatting 87.5 84% 105 fps
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 108%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L7 1TB 9,415 User benchmarks, average bench 289% 535GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4M2QEXF7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1348 1464 1438 1413 1430 1419 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	262% Outstanding	Read 1,973 Write 1,297 Mixed 760 SusWrite 1,419 304% 1,362 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 53.6 191% 71.5 MB/s	DQ Read 949 DQ Write 743 DQ Mixed 845 633% 846 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 262% Great: 380%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 405GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2089 2089 1109 1048 1072 1054 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	294% Outstanding	Read 2,216 Write 2,037 Mixed 1,676 SusWrite 1,410 412% 1,835 MB/s	4K Read 54.7 4K Write 133 4K Mixed 72.3 246% 86.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,032 DQ Write 894 DQ Mixed 957 719% 961 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 294% Great: 372%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 931GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2119 2094 1538 1501 1489 1496 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	318% Outstanding	Read 2,338 Write 2,031 Mixed 1,682 SusWrite 1,706 435% 1,939 MB/s	4K Read 56.8 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 75.8 251% 86.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,016 DQ Write 885 DQ Mixed 950 712% 950 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 318% Great: 410%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMAA4GS6MJR8N-VK HMA82GS7CJR8N-VK HMAA4GS6MJR8N-VK HMA82GS7CJR8N-VK 95GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz 32767, 16384, 32767, 16384 MB Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79.6% Very good	MC Read 26.5 MC Write 32.5 MC Mixed 25.5 80% 28.2 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 34.2 SC Mixed 25.8 72% 25.3 GB/s	Latency 73.3 54% 73.3 ns
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 73%

Battleship

CPU
Xeon E-2276MIntelBench 82%, 1,872 samples	18x

GPU
Quadro RTX 5000NvidiaBench 96%, 1,190 samples	18x

SSD
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L7 1TBSamsungBench 289%, 9,415 samples	10x
PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00-1001 1TBWDCBench 250%, 4,445 samples	2x
970 EVO Plus 1TBSamsungBench 322%, 851 samples	2x

RAM
HMA82GS7CJR8N-VK 2x16GBHynixBench 82%, 438 samples	12x
HMA82GS7CJR8N-VK Samsung M474A2K43BB1-CTD HMA82GS7CJR8N-VK Samsung M474A2K43BB1-CTD 64GBHynixBench 84%, 10 samples	3x
4x31.8GBUnknownBench 105%, 601 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16