Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive178% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-PRO/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory32.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateSep 14 '20 at 14:05
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$150
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 90.8
1-Core 128
2-Core 250
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 795
76% 626 Pts
64-Core 982
61% 982 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
EVGA(3842 6391) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 180
Parallax 182
138% 177 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 170
Splatting 116
110% 136 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 122%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 691 656 624 613 605 598 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
178% Outstanding
Read 1,712
Write 1,112
Mixed 705
SusWrite 631
231% 1040 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 83.1
4K Mixed 46
158% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 672
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 459
351% 486 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 178%
Great: 283%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
368GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 326 339 133 65 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 447
Mixed 382
SusWrite 210
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 72.6
4K Mixed 44.4
149% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 257
218% 318 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 126%
WDC WD101PURZ-85C62Y0 10TB
748GB free
Firmware: 81.H0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 152 150 154 158 158 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 152
Write 160
Mixed 88.2
SusWrite 155
31% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 1.3
9% 4.1 MB/s
DQ Read 0.7
DQ Write 5
DQ Mixed 2.4
2% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 27%
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-00000 256GB
79GB free
Firmware: EXT0100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 257 255 257 256 256 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 478
Write 258
Mixed 193
SusWrite 256
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 30.1
126% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 84.2
123% 232 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 93%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 8TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 177 173 177 179 177 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 183
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 174
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 1
244% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 107%
Great: 173%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3000 C14 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
102% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 36.3
MC Mixed 42.1
112% 39.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 21
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 102%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 487 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $1,178
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback