Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	61.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$90 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	61% Good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 58.8 2-Core 113 54% 85.4 Pts	4-Core 207 8-Core 277 31% 242 Pts	64-Core 273 17% 273 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB 15,567 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 137 60 67 61 60 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	61.5% Good	Read 304 Write 242 Mixed 237 SusWrite 108 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 74.3 4K Mixed 25.3 112% 42.1 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 228 DQ Mixed 151 128% 185 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 88%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB 1,055 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1.5TB free, PID ab24 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 134 134 135 131 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	43.4% Average	Read 62 Write 131 Mixed 52.2 SusWrite 134 138% 94.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.1 62% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-2GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-2GBXL 12GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.4% Average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 10.7 MC Mixed 14.7 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 10.7 25% 8.83 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 2x8GBUnknownBench 52%, 6,864 samples	35x
NMUD380D81-1600C 1x8GBUnknownBench 28%, 485 samples	26x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	24x

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $217

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16