MSI B450 Tomahawk

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 Tomahawk  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200609
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 13 '20 at 10:54
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 66.4
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 212
68% 125 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 347
53% 383 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1210 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Lighting 25.3
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 30.5
21% 29 fps
MRender 30.2
Gravity 25.2
Splatting 34.4
25% 29.9 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 319 317 319 309 308 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 454
Write 431
Mixed 382
SusWrite 324
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 78.5
4K Mixed 35.3
131% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 246
212% 315 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 129%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$97
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 187 189 185 191 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 179
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 188
103% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
142% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$7
29GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 12 6.2 9.2 6.2 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 160
Write 37.6
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 13.8
72% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.8
140% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.9% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 25.2
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 21.5
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 7,367 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450 Tomahawk - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $669
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback