TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Intel X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '20 at 10:29
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 57.8
2-Core 135
54% 90 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 418
42% 341 Pts
64-Core 500
31% 500 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 63.2%
 Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
MSI(1462 8D92)
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
44.7% Average
Lighting 58.1
Reflection 55.7
Parallax 53
47% 55.6 fps
MRender 42.2
Gravity 51
Splatting 50.6
40% 47.9 fps
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 44.7%
 Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ OCTANE 128GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 179 175 183 155 132 MB/s
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44% Average
Read 223
Write 192
Mixed 180
SusWrite 166
43% 190 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 31.6
4K Mixed 18.2
69% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 58.3
DQ Mixed 69.6
56% 79.2 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 44%
 Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1G73QH0- 1x8GB
1 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
30.4% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 9.9
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 7.5
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 30.4%
 Great: 35%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 535 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

CPU
Xeon E5-2420 0IntelBench 58%, 1,039 samples228x
Xeon E5-2420 v2IntelBench 62%, 669 samples126x
Xeon E5-2470 v2IntelBench 63%, 279 samples61x
GPU
RX 550AMD  $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples32x
GTX 750-TiNvidia  $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples30x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia  $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples30x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples22x
NE-256 256GBBench 159%, 6,044 samples17x
A400 120GBKingston  $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples15x
RAM
M393B5170FH0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 660 samples38x
36JSZF51272PZ 2x4GBMicronBench 46%, 364 samples36x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples33x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $107
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback