Gigabyte GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive277% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150918
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 12 '20 at 20:56
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 190
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 364
49% 364 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.4% Below average
Lighting 40
Reflection 46.2
Parallax 37.5
33% 41.2 fps
MRender 57.1
Gravity 40
Splatting 52.2
41% 49.8 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$57
321GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1079 1737 1767 1434 511 295 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
277% Outstanding
Read 2,365
Write 1,867
Mixed 1455
SusWrite 1,137
381% 1,706 MB/s
4K Read 59.9
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 77.2
258% 88.8 MB/s
DQ Read 862
DQ Write 611
DQ Mixed 574
473% 682 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 277%
Great: 311%
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
26GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 111 99 116 101 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 409
Write 324
Mixed 280
SusWrite 129
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 91.4
4K Mixed 40.4
144% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 98.9
114% 192 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 97%
Crucial MX100 128GB-$74
77GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 186 184 185 184 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 431
Write 184
Mixed 217
SusWrite 184
56% 254 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 93.3
4K Mixed 38.2
139% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 170
148% 224 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 89%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
78GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 919 631 288 289 293 294 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,262
Write 977
Mixed 678
SusWrite 452
188% 842 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 53.6
202% 74.1 MB/s
DQ Read 905
DQ Write 757
DQ Mixed 625
524% 762 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 177%
Great: 236%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
763GB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 157 157 158 157 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 157
Write 130
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 156
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
145% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
339GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 152 152 152 152 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 138
Mixed 91.7
SusWrite 151
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
59.7% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 19.2
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 18
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 905 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5 - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $783
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback