Asus H110M-R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive57.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H110M-R  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170320
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 12 '20 at 19:07
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 88.9
1-Core 107
2-Core 230
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 424
60% 441 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 260-$250
Asus(1043 82CF) 896MB
Ram: 896MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.79% Terrible
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 8.46
Parallax 4.72
9% 7.97 fps
MRender 8.29
Gravity 8.17
Splatting 5.91
6% 7.46 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.79%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 53 54 54 53 47 MB/s
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.9% Above average
Read 250
Write 104
Mixed 269
SusWrite 81.4
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 20.3
110% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 136
132% 203 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 85%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
29GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 55 56 58 56 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 45.5
Write 44
Mixed 32.3
SusWrite 53.9
32% 43.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905625-139.A00G 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
41.8% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 12.7
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 13
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-R Builds (Compare 3,603 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback