HP 520-1185a

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 520-1185a  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2ADC
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120524
Uptime9.3 Days
Run DateApr 02 '17 at 09:58
Run Duration88 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770S-$95
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 89.1
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 202
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 479
55% 428 Pts
64-Core 486
30% 486 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600A
MSI(1462 2680) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
5% Terrible
Lighting 6.57
Reflection 6.42
Parallax 5.38
5% 6.12 fps
MRender 5.52
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 5.43
4% 5.25 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$78
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP16 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 80
Write 88.3
Mixed 69.6
59% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.11
4K Write 1.03
4K Mixed 0.41
70% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 17.6
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 68.3
58% 68.3 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $250Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback