ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus G751JY

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 40% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus G751JY (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G751JY
Memory	22.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150810
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 02 '17 at 09:32
Run Duration	85 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4870HQ 3,774 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Memory 81.7 1-Core 114 2-Core 210 77% 135 Pts	4-Core 409 8-Core 549 61% 479 Pts	64-Core 557 34% 557 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980M 14,160 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Asus(1043 22DA) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1304 MHz, MLim: 1402 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.78 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	54.7% Above average	Lighting 69.1 Reflection 64 Parallax 57.5 56% 63.5 fps	MRender 68.5 Gravity 61.9 Splatting 59.8 52% 63.4 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 60%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 179GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM00.Y Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1927 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1252 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 513 (AD) Unknown 100 100 3276868 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 367 (C2) HDA temperature 65 57 184683986979 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 99 (E9) Unknown 100 100 13132 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 12414 (F2) Unknown 100 100 11128 (F4) Unknown 100 100 50 (F5) Unknown 100 100 68 (F6) Unknown 100 100 3484864	74.3% Very good	Read 503 Write 485 Mixed 508 112% 499 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 56 4K Mixed 13.9 78% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 18.7 DQ Write 56.3 DQ Mixed 10.7 16% 28.6 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1866C11S3L/8G Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 KHX1866C11S3L/8G 24GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	76.2% Very good	MC Read 41.1 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 21.9 80% 28.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 21.5 SC Mixed 19.9 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 77.4 52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical G751JY Builds (Compare 584 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

System: Asus G751JY

CPU
Core i7-4720HQIntelBench 58%, 80,960 samples	242x
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 58%, 69,536 samples	206x
Core i7-4860HQIntelBench 69%, 1,015 samples	55x

GPU
GTX 980MNvidiaBench 41%, 14,160 samples	353x
GeForce GTX 980MNvidiaBench 39%, 10,379 samples	230x
GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples	1x

SSD
XP941 PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 133%, 1,434 samples	126x
SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GBSamsung $223Bench 175%, 7,621 samples	38x
X300s Non-Secure 128GBSanDiskBench 75%, 1,499 samples	36x

RAM
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	94x
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 51%, 18,309 samples	68x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 34,976 samples	56x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback