Asus P8H61-M EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M EVO  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121217
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 11 '20 at 14:20
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G2130
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 175
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 174
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170
HP(103C 1098) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Lighting 14.7
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 10.8
12% 13.3 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 13.3
Splatting 15.5
11% 13.7 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA722050CLA330 500GB
235GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 89 101 110 113 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 114
Write 99
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 98.6
68% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 77%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
563GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 151 147 152 153 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 160
Write 152
Mixed 97.8
SusWrite 147
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
232% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BOW0-GN-F 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
35.4% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 10.5
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 11
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M EVO Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $224
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback