Asus X550JX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X550JX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550JX
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150811
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '20 at 13:45
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 87
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 180
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 441
46% 367 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ASP600S7-256GM-B 256GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 115 60 71 51 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 407
Write 209
Mixed 189
SusWrite 81.6
49% 222 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 28.9
118% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 55.8
70% 127 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 82%
Toshiba MQ01ACF050 500GB-$150
259GB free
Firmware: AV002E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 108 107 108 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
63% Good
Read 112
Write 106
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 108
69% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 63%
Great: 69%
WDC WD50 00BEVT-00A0RT0 500GB
204GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 37 40 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 39.2
Write 38
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 38.8
49% 36 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.8% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 14.7
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 14.8
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X550JX Builds (Compare 1,135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550JX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback