Gigabyte GA-H81M-H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics95.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive40.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-H  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '20 at 22:42
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 45%
Watch Gameplay: 5700 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 93.3
2-Core 165
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 355
46% 346 Pts
64-Core 310
19% 310 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$275
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 97.5
Parallax 188
96% 135 fps
MRender 95.8
Gravity 105
Splatting 135
94% 112 fps
Poor: 78%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 49 49 46 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 147
Write 51.7
Mixed 78
SusWrite 48.1
18% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 25.4
95% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 67.5
DQ Write 52.2
DQ Mixed 51.6
41% 57.1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 69%
WD Re 2TB-$38
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01D02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 124 125 126 127 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 118
Write 117
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 125
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
213% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 0420 DDR3 1600 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
56.3% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 18
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 18.4
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 80.9
50% 80.9 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-H Builds (Compare 1,373 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-H - $169

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $347
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback