Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R  (all builds)
Memory7.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101126
Uptime24.6 Days
Run DateSep 08 '20 at 11:21
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 36%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$100
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 89
1-Core 70.5
2-Core 130
60% 96.5 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 296
34% 264 Pts
64-Core 341
21% 341 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.28
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Lighting 38.1
Reflection 30.3
Parallax 37.2
31% 35.2 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 38.4
Splatting 36
30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Marvell Raid VD 0 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MV.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 134 163 172 186 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 259
Write 195
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 158
127% 174 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.4
248% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 120%
Great: 164%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$34
627GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 105 108 109 111 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 85.3
Write 90.5
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 107
64% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 76%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
604GB free
Firmware: 280.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 30 31 31 30 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 83.8
Write 97.7
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 34
45% 62 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
116% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 86%
Synology iSCSI Storage 43GB
40GB free
Firmware: 3.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
6.88% Terrible
Read 10.9
Write 10.5
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 10.4
8% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 4.1
702% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.88%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x8GB
3 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.4% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 15.8
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 10
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X58A-UD3R Builds (Compare 2,035 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $397
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback