Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics64% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200610
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateSep 07 '20 at 20:27
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7640X-$110
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 137
2-Core 270
93% 167 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 501
71% 521 Pts
64-Core 542
34% 542 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64% Good
Lighting 80.6
Reflection 79.9
Parallax 69.2
66% 76.6 fps
MRender 71.9
Gravity 74.4
Splatting 75.6
61% 74 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB-$90
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 195 192 195 190 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 429
Write 432
Mixed 277
SusWrite 180
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 46.7
181% 67.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 232
201% 300 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 100%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
199GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 427 462 463 465 354 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 457
Write 460
Mixed 353
SusWrite 418
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 95.1
4K Mixed 56.9
161% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 362
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 112%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
702GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 140 140 140 140 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 164
Write 154
Mixed 90.5
SusWrite 140
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 196 193 188 189 199 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 138
Write 154
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 192
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
139% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$31
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
70.7% Very good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 21.3
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 22.5
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,654 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $796
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback