Razer Blade Stealth 13 (Early 2020) - RZ09-0310

Performance Results


Gaming 110% UFO	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 95% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	140% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	319% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Razer Blade Stealth 13 (Early 2020) - RZ09-0310 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer LY325
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200526
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 07 '20 at 19:39
Run Duration	115 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	19%
CPU Throttled	86%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-1065G7 58,314 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	Memory 68.1 1-Core 130 2-Core 233 79% 144 Pts	4-Core 452 8-Core 625 68% 538 Pts	64-Core 627 39% 627 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 70%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel Iris Plus G7 52,498 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Device(1A58 1003) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7463 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Lighting 17.7 Reflection 16 Parallax 15.2 14% 16.3 fps	MRender 18.8 Gravity 17.7 Splatting 30.5 19% 22.3 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 13%
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% EVGA(3842 2382) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	140% Outstanding	Lighting 193 Reflection 199 Parallax 219 158% 204 fps	MRender 208 Gravity 186 Splatting 122 135% 172 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 140% Great: 174%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SHGP31-1000GM-2 1TB 9,764 User benchmarks, average bench 312% 717GB free (System drive) Firmware: 41060C20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2162 1952 1397 1322 1305 1340 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	319% Outstanding	Read 2,420 Write 2,212 Mixed 1,540 SusWrite 1,580 434% 1,938 MB/s	4K Read 58.5 4K Write 143 4K Mixed 81.8 269% 94.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,045 DQ Write 840 DQ Mixed 904 687% 930 MB/s
Poor: 181% ↑ This bench: 319% Great: 414%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K4UBE3D4AA-MGCL 2x8GB 7,828 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3733 MHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	MC Read 44.9 MC Write 43.3 MC Mixed 38.9 121% 42.4 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 32.5 SC Mixed 26.6 72% 25.4 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Stealth 13 (Early 2020) - RZ09-0310 Builds (Compare 302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade Stealth 13 (Early 2020) - RZ09-0310

CPU
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	302x

GPU
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	166x
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 38%, 3,536 samples	105x
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	3x

SSD
CA5-8D512 512GBNvmeBench 171%, 2,452 samples	92x
CA5-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 181%, 1,283 samples	67x
MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GBSamsungBench 231%, 4,252 samples	59x

RAM
K4UBE3D4AA-MGCL 2x8GBSamsungBench 104%, 7,828 samples	246x
2x8GBMicronBench 83%, 3,676 samples	56x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16