MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '20 at 16:42
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 69.4
1-Core 139
2-Core 219
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 842
76% 640 Pts
64-Core 1,503
93% 1,503 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Zotac(19DA 7500) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
119% Outstanding
Lighting 158
Reflection 147
Parallax 158
129% 155 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 134
Splatting 107
113% 143 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 119%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42B1S6HA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,576
Write 1,974
Mixed 236
349% 1,595 MB/s
4K Read 59.7
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 84.1
282% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,088
DQ Write 868
DQ Mixed 580
542% 845 MB/s
Poor: 147% Great: 311%
Adata SX6000LNP 1TB
297GB free
Firmware: V9001c00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 747 731 759 750 754 754 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 1,738
Write 733
Mixed 763
SusWrite 749
220% 996 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 51.1
195% 74.2 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 481
DQ Mixed 467
329% 408 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 192%
Great: 268%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 497GB
156GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 358 323 303 297 344 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 429
Mixed 390
SusWrite 342
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 51.6
172% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 199
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 102%
Great: 128%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 119 119 122 118 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 132
Write 117
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 119
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
190% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 84%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 125 128 126 128 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 121
Write 116
Mixed 79.6
SusWrite 126
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 84%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
194GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 89 89 89 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 90.2
Write 70.5
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 87.8
58% 78 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 67%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -1 128GB
25GB free, PID 0301
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 82 83 81 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 87.6
Write 77.2
Mixed 62.7
SusWrite 80.2
103% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 4.4
279% 4.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
68.3% Good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 26.8
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 27.6
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,746 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,052
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback