Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Memory 92 1-Core 94.7 2-Core 185 73% 124 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 359 46% 349 Pts	64-Core 360 22% 360 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6700 4,583 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Sapphire(174B E144) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 6% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hkvsn HS-SSD-C10 120GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 70 73 72 72 71 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	62.4% Good	Read 466 Write 337 Mixed 315 SusWrite 87.1 67% 301 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 51.6 4K Mixed 21 102% 34.8 MB/s	DQ Read 140 DQ Write 220 DQ Mixed 33.4 66% 131 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 247GB free Firmware: JC49 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 81 81 81 82 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	57.3% Above average	Read 119 Write 122 Mixed 69.8 SusWrite 80.7 72% 97.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 190% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99P5474-004.A00LF 2x2GB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 15.7 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 15.5 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 64 62% 64 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	766x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	325x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	308x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	67x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,925 samples	61x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	60x

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $214