Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics79.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160603
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 31 '17 at 08:41
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Memory 94
1-Core 134
2-Core 263
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 806
82% 665 Pts
64-Core 1,065
66% 1,065 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.92
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.4% Very good
Lighting 99.2
Reflection 110
Parallax 102
81% 104 fps
MRender 93.7
Gravity 92.1
Splatting 93.9
76% 93.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba OCZ TL100 240GB-$56
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFZ10.1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 512
Write 72.7
Mixed 136
52% 240 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 42
4K Mixed 7.66
82% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 309
DQ Write 75.9
DQ Mixed 9.44
54% 131 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 89%
Adata SP600 128GB
37GB free
Firmware: 2.9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 417
Write 125
Mixed 86.6
45% 210 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 16.4
72% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 3.33
44% 106 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 92%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$86
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 117
Write 97.8
Mixed 98.2
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.22
93% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
80GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 130
Write 110
Mixed 105
86% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.95
4K Write 2.14
4K Mixed 0.3
112% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 109%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB
143GB free, PID 0475
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 39.4
Write 42.1
Mixed 32.6
49% 38 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.43
4K Mixed 0.33
62% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.9% Good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 24.2
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 23.5
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 811 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $773
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback