Dell XPS 13 9360

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemDell XPS 13 9360  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0839Y6
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3200 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '17 at 07:07
Run Duration87 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 70.6
1-Core 110
2-Core 202
71% 128 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 309
42% 311 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Dell(1028 075B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4574
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
5.66% Terrible
Lighting 6.23
Reflection 9.62
Parallax 5.22
5% 7.02 fps
MRender 6.71
Gravity 5.23
Splatting 11.5
7% 7.82 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.66%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PC300 SK hy 512GB
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 1,372
Write 647
Mixed 789
206% 936 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 18.4
102% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 24.8
56% 113 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 131%
Great: 167%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9CCNNNCLTMLAR-NUD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
60.3% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 20.4
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 17.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 13 9360 Builds (Compare 1,641 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 13 9360

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback