Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200813
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateSep 07 '20 at 00:54
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 82.8
1-Core 144
2-Core 282
92% 169 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 814
77% 638 Pts
64-Core 1,024
63% 1,024 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 77.2
Reflection 93.6
Parallax 111
63% 93.8 fps
Gravity 146
Splatting 166
139% 156 fps
Poor: 91% Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 2 4TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 33 58 76 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 345
Mixed 140
SusWrite 60.6
182% 249 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 1.9
443% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 148%
Great: 374%
Amd-raid WDC WD15EARS-60M 1.5TB
369GB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 41 40 40 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.8% Below average
Read 70.5
Write 60.5
Mixed 34.8
SusWrite 39.9
38% 51.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 35%
Amd-raid WDC WD2002FAEX-0 2TB
244GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 103 103 101 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 77.7
Write 87.8
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 102
56% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
60.7% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 20.6
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 20.8
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,608 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,216
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback