TYAN S2892

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	TYAN S2892 (all builds)
Motherboard	TYAN S2892
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20060314
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 06 '20 at 16:56
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	78%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Dual Core AMD Opteron 285 21 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU0-Socket 940, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	46% Average	Memory 68.9 1-Core 38.1 2-Core 71.2 40% 59.4 Pts	4-Core 134 8-Core 146 18% 140 Pts	64-Core 152 9% 152 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240 11,020 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Nvidia(10DE 075B) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.00 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	4.39% Terrible	Lighting 5.83 Reflection 6.81 Parallax 2.41 5% 5.02 fps	MRender 6.33 Gravity 4.17 Splatting 3.48 4% 4.66 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.39% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 164GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3Z4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 101 102 105 102 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.3% Below average	Read 120 Write 103 Mixed 105 SusWrite 100 24% 107 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 39.5 4K Mixed 17.7 73% 25.6 MB/s	DQ Read 23.9 DQ Write 72.5 DQ Mixed 22.5 25% 39.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 100%
WD WD2500JD-00HBB0 250GB-$140 3,296 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 196GB free Firmware: 08.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 57 56 57 56 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	31.7% Below average	Read 53.4 Write 57.1 Mixed 31.3 SusWrite 56.5 36% 49.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 169% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 33%
Seagate ST3300631A 300GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 279GB free Firmware: 3.04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 59 59 59 58 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	32.7% Below average	Read 55.1 Write 27.1 Mixed 40.3 SusWrite 58.8 34% 45.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 122% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 33%
WD WD2500JD-00HBB0 250GB-$140 3,296 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 233GB free Firmware: 08.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 58 58 58 58 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	31.5% Below average	Read 51.4 Write 60.2 Mixed 36.6 SusWrite 58 38% 51.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 33%
WD WD2500JD-00HBB0 250GB-$140 3,296 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 172GB free Firmware: 08.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 56 57 56 56 56 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	31.5% Below average	Read 52.8 Write 59.6 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 56.6 38% 51.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x2GB 8,850 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 8 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DRAM Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.1% Very poor	MC Read 3.2 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 2.8 9% 3.07 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 2.8 8% 2.7 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 142%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

TYAN S2892

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)