MSI G41M-P28 (MS-7592)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7592
MotherboardMSI G41M-P28 (MS-7592)  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110302
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '20 at 15:54
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Memory 54.7
1-Core 13.8
2-Core 46
27% 38.2 Pts
4-Core 45.6
8-Core 48.6
6% 47.1 Pts
64-Core 54.7
3% 54.7 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 301.42
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.64% Terrible
Lighting 0.63
Reflection 1.04
Parallax 0.28
0% 0.65 fps
MRender 1.95
Gravity 0.43
Splatting 0.91
1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.64%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1600AVVS-63L2B0 160GB
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 13 9.6 23 35 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 28.3
Write 28.2
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 20.7
20% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
82% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 44%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
415GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 35 56 44 45 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 47.5
Write 41.1
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 50.5
30% 41 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
58% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 5.3
15% 5.23 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 2.6
7% 2.53 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G41M-P28 (MS-7592) Builds (Compare 131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI G41M-P28 (MS-7592)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback