Asrock X79 Champion

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive98.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X79 Champion  (all builds)
Memory55.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3240 x 1920 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140303
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 06 '20 at 10:13
Run Duration385 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$100
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 88.1
1-Core 118
2-Core 235
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 677
69% 559 Pts
64-Core 842
52% 842 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM02.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 456 459 448 374 428 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 487
Mixed 362
SusWrite 437
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 34.3
120% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 185
182% 290 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 111%
OCZ AGILITY4 128GB
67GB free
Firmware: 1.5.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 274 275 270 249 249 MB/s
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
71.2% Very good
Read 247
Write 275
Mixed 203
SusWrite 264
56% 247 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 89.1
4K Mixed 28
113% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 198
163% 230 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 81%
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149
68GB free
Firmware: 4PC1LE04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 168 169 167 165 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 252
Write 168
Mixed 162
SusWrite 167
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 32.7
4K Mixed 21.5
72% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 73.5
DQ Mixed 56.7
55% 88.5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 51%
LSI MR9260-4i 2TB
657GB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 273 272 273 272 272 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 38% Great: 93%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4.5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 153 139 149 147 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 132
Write 81
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 144
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 36.8
109% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 14.1
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Champion Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Champion

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $636
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback