TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Aspire 5741G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire 5741G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire 5741G
Memory0.9 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100205
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 05 '20 at 20:32
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 430
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
46% Average
Memory 66.2
1-Core 63.3
2-Core 115
50% 81.5 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 151
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 46%
 Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 320M
Acer(1025 036D) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.48% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 2.27
Parallax 0.59
1% 1.45 fps
MRender 4.14
Gravity 1.03
Splatting 2.26
2% 2.48 fps
Poor: 1% ↑
This bench: 1.48%
 Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 159 163 170 156 163 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.9% Average
Read 227
Write 170
Mixed 182
SusWrite 159
41% 185 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 22.1
75% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 137
107% 149 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑
This bench: 48.9%
 Great: 87%
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59
112GB free
Firmware: PB3OC60F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 60 62 62 56 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 59.9
Write 60.9
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 59.7
40% 54 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑
This bench: 34.4%
 Great: 42%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
203GB free, PID a00b
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 24 24 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 20
Mixed 17.4
SusWrite 24
29% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑
This bench: 15%
 Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ10UE8BDS0-AE-F M471B5673EH1-CF8 3GB
1067, 1067 MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
23.9% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 9.4
23% 8.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.5
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 22% ↑
This bench: 23.9%
 Great: 24%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Aspire 5741G Builds (Compare 114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5741G

CPU
Core i5 M 430IntelBench 39%, 14,318 samples58x
Core i3 M 330IntelBench 38%, 14,119 samples17x
Core i3 M 350Intel  $199Bench 38%, 14,351 samples17x
GPU
GeForce GT 320MNvidiaBench 1%, 1,680 samples95x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples19x
SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples5x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples4x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples3x
RAM
M471B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 5,297 samples14x
EBJ21UE8BDS0-AE-F 2x2GBElpidaBench 26%, 802 samples12x
M471B5673EH1-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 2,358 samples10x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback