Toshiba SATELLITE L50D-B

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE L50D-B (all builds)
Motherboard	AMD Larne
Memory	3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140506
Uptime	262.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 05 '20 at 08:09
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-5000 APU 10,330 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	Memory 50.8 1-Core 22.1 2-Core 41.6 27% 38.2 Pts	4-Core 63.9 8-Core 78.1 9% 71 Pts	64-Core 87.2 5% 87.2 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330 8,573 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 F925) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 18.5.1 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1% Terrible	Lighting 1.87 Reflection 3.92 Parallax 2.38 2% 2.72 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba Q Series Pro 128GB-$66 2,808 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: JTRA0102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 269 275 258 247 193 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	59% Above average	Read 408 Write 364 Mixed 380 SusWrite 261 80% 353 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 26.3 4K Mixed 21.3 64% 21 MB/s	DQ Read 170 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 131 101% 140 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GB 40,451 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.8% Very poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 4.3 MC Mixed 6.9 18% 6.37 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 6.8 15% 5.4 GB/s	Latency 158 25% 158 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE L50D-B Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE L50D-B

CPU
A8-6410 APU R5 GraphicsAMDBench 32%, 19,683 samples	20x
A6-6310 APU R4 GraphicsAMDBench 33%, 10,893 samples	9x
A4-6210 APU R3 GraphicsAMDBench 30%, 5,378 samples	8x

GPU
Radeon R5AMDBench 2%, 40,685 samples	20x
Radeon R4AMDBench 2%, 19,746 samples	9x
Radeon R3 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 6,021 samples	8x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x
MX500 250GBCrucial $39Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	2x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

RAM
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	13x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	7x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16