Asus P8P67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics36.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory21.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121130
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 05 '20 at 05:05
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$190
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 87
1-Core 112
2-Core 219
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 542
60% 473 Pts
64-Core 540
33% 540 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Lighting 47.6
Reflection 44.8
Parallax 39.6
39% 44 fps
MRender 38.7
Gravity 41.1
Splatting 36.2
31% 38.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000L7 256GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT09L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 205 187 188 170 166 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 359
Write 243
Mixed 156
SusWrite 187
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 24.7
98% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 34.9
DQ Write 95
DQ Mixed 30.9
33% 53.6 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
350GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 157 158 160 159 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 82.7
Write 82.3
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 158
69% 94 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD38G16002 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
51.4% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 16.5
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 17.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M PRO Builds (Compare 391 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M PRO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $554
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback