Asrock X370 Gaming X

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Gaming X (all builds)
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 04 '20 at 20:01
Run Duration	234 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87 71,313 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	63.1% Good	Memory 74.3 1-Core 95.7 2-Core 176 66% 115 Pts	4-Core 280 8-Core 509 47% 395 Pts	64-Core 535 33% 535 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 69%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GB 13,215 User benchmarks, average bench 190% 168GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXD7201Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 525 329 312 288 288 283 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	189% Outstanding	Read 2,178 Write 1,522 Mixed 1,204 SusWrite 338 290% 1,310 MB/s	4K Read 56.5 4K Write 61.2 4K Mixed 55.2 189% 57.6 MB/s	DQ Read 799 DQ Write 240 DQ Mixed 377 315% 472 MB/s
Poor: 119% ↑ This bench: 189% Great: 249%
Samsung MZNLN512HMJP-000H1 512GB 1,400 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 356GB free Firmware: MAV21H3Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 475 468 467 467 467 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 472 Mixed 414 SusWrite 464 104% 462 MB/s	4K Read 44.3 4K Write 58.4 4K Mixed 49.8 162% 50.8 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 253 DQ Mixed 364 259% 332 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 128%
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$54 40,725 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 26GB free Firmware: P1021A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 505 Write 456 Mixed 427 103% 463 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 53.1 4K Mixed 37.2 121% 40.1 MB/s	DQ Read 254 DQ Write 261 DQ Mixed 256 193% 257 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 118%
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$40 12,609 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 113GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 110 112 112 120 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	67.8% Good	Read 125 Write 129 Mixed 23.1 SusWrite 112 70% 97.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 90% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2E3200C16 2x8GB 17,343 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	MC Read 42.9 MC Write 39.7 MC Mixed 35.8 113% 39.5 GB/s	SC Read 23.7 SC Write 30.9 SC Mixed 27.4 78% 27.3 GB/s	Latency 91.9 44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Gaming X Builds (Compare 237 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 46%

Yacht

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 45%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming X

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	26x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	24x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	22x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	16x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	13x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	13x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	9x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	9x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	8x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	9x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	7x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $400

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16