ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Pavilion zv5000 (DU910U#ABA)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP Pavilion zv5000 (DU910U#ABA) (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 089C
Memory	1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20050406
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 04 '20 at 15:45
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	BOL-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4 2.66GHz-$70 228 User benchmarks, average bench 23% JP8, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	Memory 33.7 1-Core 30.7 2-Core 31.1 22% 31.8 Pts	4-Core 31 8-Core 31.5 4% 31.2 Pts	64-Core 31.2 2% 31.2 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 37%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
IC25N060ATMR04-0 60GB 88 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: MO3OAD5A SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 18 18 19 19 19 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	9.78% Terrible	Read 15.9 Write 17.8 Mixed 11.6 SusWrite 17.9 12% 15.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.3 62% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 9.78% Great: 14%
Sony Storage Media 8GB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 2GB free, PID 06b1 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4 4.3 4.2 4.8 4.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	4.5% Terrible	Read 17.9 Write 1.3 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 4.3 7% 7.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.5% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DRAM Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	6.38% Terrible	MC Read 1.9 MC Write 2.1 MC Mixed 1.6 5% 1.87 GB/s	SC Read 2 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 1.2 5% 1.87 GB/s	Latency 234 17% 234 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.38% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback