Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive296% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 04 '20 at 06:34
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 160
2-Core 316
102% 189 Pts
4-Core 611
8-Core 1,223
108% 917 Pts
64-Core 2,931
181% 2,931 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 103%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700XT 50th Anniversary
AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 91% Great: 103%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
527GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1542 936 945 952 952 944 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
296% Outstanding
Read 2,076
Write 3,673
Mixed 2,232
SusWrite 1,045
511% 2,256 MB/s
4K Read 51.8
4K Write 199
4K Mixed 90.5
300% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,404
DQ Write 1,115
DQ Mixed 1,311
967% 1,277 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 296%
Great: 486%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$200
327GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2468 2480 1570 1273 1273 1273 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
356% Outstanding
Read 2,524
Write 2,397
Mixed 1,645
SusWrite 1723
465% 2,072 MB/s
4K Read 59.3
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 83.2
286% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,499
DQ Write 1,256
DQ Mixed 1,347
1,017% 1367 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 356%
Great: 371%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
136% Outstanding
MC Read 53.9
MC Write 49.6
MC Mixed 49.8
146% 51.1 GB/s
SC Read 30.2
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 45.8
99% 34.7 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 136%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,050 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,546
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback