HP Compaq CQ58 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq CQ58 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 169A
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140604
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 04 '20 at 01:16
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD C-60 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
24% Poor
Memory 43.9
1-Core 14.2
2-Core 21.2
20% 26.4 Pts
4-Core 26.3
8-Core 27.6
4% 27 Pts
64-Core 28.3
2% 28.3 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 24%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6290 Graphics (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.20)
HP(103C 169A) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.93.7.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.55% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.92
Parallax 0.72
0% 0.75 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.37
Splatting 1.04
1% 0.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.55%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$22
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 32 55 42 71 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 16.8
Write 21.9
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 46.4
18% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
51% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMT3170EB68F9W1600 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.8% Terrible
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 3.7
9% 3.2 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 2.8
6% 2.03 GB/s
Latency 185
22% 185 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.8%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq CQ58 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq CQ58 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback