Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Http://www.abit.com.tw/ AB9/AB9RPO(Intel965+ICH8) (all builds)
Memory	3.9 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20071106
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Sep 03 '20 at 19:51
Run Duration	118 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	48%

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core I9 9900K Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32% Below average	Memory 57.9 1-Core 20.2 2-Core 32.7 28% 36.9 Pts	4-Core 40.1 8-Core 33.5 5% 36.8 Pts	64-Core 35.2 2% 35.2 Pts

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 240 58,337 User benchmarks, average bench 5% MSI(1462 8094) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	4.5% Terrible	Lighting 5.6 Reflection 7.04 Parallax 8.22 5% 6.95 fps	MRender 3.95 Gravity 6.3 Splatting 5.57 4% 5.27 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.5% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03.03E03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 16 10 12 17 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	7.31% Terrible	Read 11.5 Write 16.2 Mixed 14.5 SusWrite 13.9 10% 14 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 45% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 7.31% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x1GB 7,767 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 3 of 4 slots used 3GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	9.07% Terrible	MC Read 2.8 MC Write 2.3 MC Mixed 2.3 7% 2.47 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 3 8% 2.67 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.07% Great: 40%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	3x
Core2 Quad Q6700Intel $44Bench 44%, 6,294 samples	2x

RAM
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	5x

Value: 34% - Below average

Total price: $322

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16