Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_X571GT

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	45.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	142% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_X571GT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X571GT
Memory	7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191108
Uptime	2.7 Days
Run Date	Sep 02 '20 at 12:57
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Memory 89.4 1-Core 121 2-Core 210 81% 140 Pts	4-Core 391 8-Core 584 61% 487 Pts	64-Core 575 36% 575 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile) 92,838 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Asus(1043 1A81) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5177 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Lighting 59.6 Reflection 59.6 Parallax 48.6 49% 55.9 fps	MRender 45 Gravity 49.1 Splatting 50.7 40% 48.3 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB 26,870 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 138GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80001C00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 364 365 366 348 332 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	142% Outstanding	Read 1,037 Write 653 Mixed 472 SusWrite 370 140% 633 MB/s	4K Read 39.6 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 42.9 171% 62.6 MB/s	DQ Read 503 DQ Write 672 DQ Mixed 417 362% 531 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 142% Great: 153%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 675GB free Firmware: 04.01A04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 112 112 111 110 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Read 111 Write 106 Mixed 65.6 SusWrite 111 72% 98.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 0.8 182% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 16GB 1,437 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2400, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.1% Very good	MC Read 27.4 MC Write 25.2 MC Mixed 21 70% 24.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 26.1 SC Mixed 22.8 63% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 67.9 59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_X571GT Builds (Compare 739 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_X571GT

CPU
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	389x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	184x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	108x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	463x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	276x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	302x
SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBIntelBench 185%, 19,397 samples	163x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	159x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	207x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 16GBHynixBench 76%, 1,437 samples	116x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GBSamsungBench 74%, 928 samples	67x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16