Biostar TB350-BTC

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	42.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Biostar TB350-BTC (all builds)
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190305
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 02 '20 at 11:50
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-9600 APU (2016 D.BR) 12,273 User benchmarks, average bench 40% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	52% Above average	Memory 69 1-Core 64.3 2-Core 102 49% 78.4 Pts	4-Core 207 8-Core 194 27% 201 Pts	64-Core 205 13% 205 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126 94,030 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Sapphire(174B E347) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 27.20.2001.16003 Performing below potential (71^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.4% Average	Lighting 51 Reflection 60.9 Parallax 69.4 42% 60.5 fps	MRender 61.1 Gravity 52.5 Splatting 49.8 44% 54.5 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PH6-CE120-G 120GB 664 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: F/W:1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 72 72 65 86 74 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Read 454 Write 262 Mixed 318 SusWrite 92.5 62% 281 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 68.3 4K Mixed 24.2 115% 41.3 MB/s	DQ Read 237 DQ Write 281 DQ Mixed 180 158% 233 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 84%
Generic Mass-Storage 32GB 2,578 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 4GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	2.3% Terrible	Read 0.8 Write 0.8 Mixed 0.7 SusWrite 0.8 1% 0.77 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 47% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.3% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905678-023.A00G 1x8GB 4,415 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.2% Poor	MC Read 11.3 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 8.9 27% 9.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 7.7 19% 6.6 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TB350-BTC Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Biostar TB350-BTC

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	11x
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	9x
Ryzen 5 1600AFAMD $112Bench 72%, 52,721 samples	7x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	9x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	9x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	5x

SSD
SU635 240GBAdata $20Bench 68%, 12,702 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	3x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x16GBKingstonBench 47%, 14,529 samples	3x
Skill Intl F4-3000C16-8GISB 2x8GBGBench 85%, 4,000 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $260

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16