Asrock X570 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive357% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X570 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200811
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '20 at 10:27
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Memory 84.2
1-Core 158
2-Core 314
100% 186 Pts
4-Core 609
8-Core 847
92% 728 Pts
64-Core 1,126
70% 1,126 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
112% Outstanding
Lighting 147
Reflection 142
Parallax 151
120% 147 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 126
Splatting 105
108% 136 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 112%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
824GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1719 1792 1673 1556 1551 1576 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
357% Outstanding
Read 2,570
Write 1,943
Mixed 1790
SusWrite 1,644
445% 1,987 MB/s
4K Read 68.2
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 94.9
316% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1303
DQ Write 1,219
DQ Mixed 1,264
948% 1,262 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 357%
Great: 410%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 850 500GB
18GB free
Firmware: EMT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 434
Write 427
Mixed 338
89% 400 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 63.6
4K Mixed 38.5
134% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 121
100% 139 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 99%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 860 1TB
152GB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 420 417 421 422 420 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 463
Write 415
Mixed 429
SusWrite 420
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 65.4
4K Mixed 37.4
121% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 123
100% 139 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 95%
Amd-raid WDC WD10EZRX-00A 1TB
194GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 114 115 114 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 100
Write 95.7
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 113
67% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 78%
Amd-raid WDC WD1003FZEX-0 1TB
44GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 160 163 164 164 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 120
Write 101
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 162
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 81%
Great: 176%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.6% Good
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 21.2
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 23.2
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Taichi Builds (Compare 2,215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Taichi - $213

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,378
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback