Gigabyte GA-M68MT-S2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics36% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-M68MT-S2  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120605
Uptime5 Days
Run DateMar 28 '17 at 23:07
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4100-$110
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
48.7% Average
Memory 76.8
1-Core 50.7
2-Core 86.9
47% 71.5 Pts
4-Core 121
8-Core 129
16% 125 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Gigabyte(1458 3603) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
36% Below average
Lighting 43.3
Reflection 39
Parallax 50.9
35% 44.4 fps
MRender 53.1
Gravity 50.5
Splatting 37.1
37% 46.9 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDP725032GLA 320GB
83GB free
Firmware: GM3O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 75.6
Write 64.6
Mixed 66.1
52% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.34
76% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 44%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA 500GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 96.4
Write 93.3
Mixed 110
76% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.22
4K Write 1.03
4K Mixed 0.17
47% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
33.3% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 13.5
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9.3
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-M68MT-S2 Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-M68MT-S2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $138
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback