Asus GL552VX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive89% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus GL552VX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL552VX
Memory20.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '20 at 19:29
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 72.5
1-Core 93.2
2-Core 178
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 519
51% 416 Pts
64-Core 511
32% 511 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS200T2B0A-00SM50 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 411040WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 458 458 457 458 457 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 435
Write 445
Mixed 328
SusWrite 443
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 90
4K Mixed 44.1
156% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 244
207% 304 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 108%
Great: 117%
Plextor PX-256M7VG 256GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 235 226 235 224 233 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 466
Write 401
Mixed 363
SusWrite 244
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 59.7
4K Mixed 39
132% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 287
225% 312 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 89%
Great: 101%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
115GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 82 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 87.5
Write 88.1
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 81.6
50% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB 24GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
55.7% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 16.4
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 16.3
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL552VX Builds (Compare 784 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL552VX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback