Dell Latitude D630

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive30.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemDell Latitude D630  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0KU184
Memory3.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080620
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '17 at 12:55
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T7250-$97
Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Memory 69.2
1-Core 25.2
2-Core 45.1
34% 46.5 Pts
4-Core 45.7
8-Core 45.6
6% 45.7 Pts
64-Core 46
3% 46 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset Family
Dell(1028 01F9) 384MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1930
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.15
Parallax 0.28
0% 0.25 fps
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.39
0% 0.35 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 128GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM02D1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.1% Below average
Read 194
Write 128
Mixed 141
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 9.88
4K Write 31.9
4K Mixed 9.04
43% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 19.9
DQ Write 47.9
DQ Mixed 10.4
15% 26.1 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.27 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4.3
13% 4.4 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude D630 Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude D630

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 17% - Very poor Total price: $306
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback