Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X2 555 4,836 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Memory 36.7 1-Core 13.4 2-Core 18.5 17% 22.9 Pts	4-Core 9.8 8-Core 23.8 2% 16.8 Pts	64-Core 18.3 1% 18.3 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5400 10,400 User benchmarks, average bench 1% PwrHis(1787 3000) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.96% Terrible	Lighting 1.17 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 1.56 1% 1.38 fps	MRender 1.43 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 1.3 1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.96% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 161GB free (System drive) Firmware: 583ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 111 130 134 137 137 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	21.8% Poor	Read 127 Write 111 Mixed 119 SusWrite 125 27% 120 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 10.3 4K Mixed 8.8 23% 7.73 MB/s	DQ Read 22 DQ Write 53.8 DQ Mixed 29.6 25% 35.1 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-2GBNS0 F3-10666CL9-2GBNS0 4GB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	9.25% Terrible	MC Read 3.1 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 3.9 9% 3.27 GB/s	SC Read 0.5 SC Write 1.4 SC Mixed 1.4 3% 1.1 GB/s	Latency 218 18% 218 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 9.25% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	55x
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	33x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	16x

RAM
2x4GBAdataBench 60%, 13,050 samples	12x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	9x
99U5471-054.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 30%, 12,132 samples	9x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $177

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16