Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '20 at 10:34
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 69.7
1-Core 142
2-Core 285
88% 166 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 1,132
100% 851 Pts
64-Core 2,162
134% 2,162 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.8.2
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
55% Above average
Lighting 68.7
Reflection 71.3
Parallax 86.7
56% 75.6 fps
MRender 70.8
Gravity 69.1
Splatting 58.1
53% 66 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
314GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 470 474 481 472 481 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 480
Mixed 394
SusWrite 472
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 51.4
176% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 301
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 289
217% 289 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 117%
Great: 124%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
112GB free
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 96 96 91 91 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 492
Write 418
Mixed 381
SusWrite 131
79% 355 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 24.1
131% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 32.8
82% 167 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 78%
WD WD1001FALS-00U9B0 1TB
402GB free
Firmware: 06.01D02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 106 106 107 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 117
Write 107
Mixed 101
SusWrite 106
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
171% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
931GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 176 176 177 178 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 154
Mixed 93.8
SusWrite 176
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
229% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
Seagate ST33000651AS 3TB-$78
3TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 151 148 146 151 153 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 146
Write 146
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 150
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
194% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 86%
Seagate Expansion Desk 10TB
4TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 208 209 210 210 212 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 107%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
22GB free, PID 2320
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 80 79 79 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 74.6
Write 54.9
Mixed 46.9
SusWrite 79.8
85% 64.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 42%
WDC WD10 EAVS-00M4B0 1TB
931GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 39 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 37.1
Write 38.3
Mixed 33
SusWrite 39.4
51% 36.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 28.8
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 26.5
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,072 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $427
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback