Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics82% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '20 at 22:05
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 88%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Memory 82.7
1-Core 142
2-Core 285
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 1,133
100% 850 Pts
64-Core 2,150
133% 2,150 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 114
Parallax 96.3
82% 104 fps
MRender 98.5
Gravity 95.6
Splatting 102
81% 98.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 333 331 334 335 334 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 352
Mixed 280
SusWrite 333
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 37.8
139% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 105
105% 169 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 110%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
421GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 452 454 459 459 459 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 453
Mixed 408
SusWrite 456
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 55.8
184% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 200
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 114%
Great: 134%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$87
834GB free
Firmware: 42AZS6AC Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1647 1655 1658 1663 1558 1605 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
340% Outstanding
Read 2,498
Write 1,657
Mixed 222
SusWrite 1,631
333% 1,502 MB/s
4K Read 64.2
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 88
296% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,236
DQ Write 932
DQ Mixed 510
537% 893 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 340%
Great: 372%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 96 96 98 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 91.9
Write 95.3
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 96.1
63% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.9% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 20.5
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 22.4
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $178

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,011
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback