Asus X99-E-10G WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics70.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive284% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-E-10G WS  (all builds)
Memory123.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '20 at 12:55
Run Duration296 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v4
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 64.2
2-Core 127
56% 90.6 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 509
45% 382 Pts
64-Core 2,230
138% 2,230 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.52
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.6% Very good
Lighting 94.4
Reflection 120
Parallax 114
77% 109 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 0.23
Splatting 102
58% 68.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
454GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1656 1771 1761 1658 1573 1626 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 2489
Write 1,879
Mixed 1,351
SusWrite 1674
413% 1,848 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 85.5
4K Mixed 54.7
186% 62.3 MB/s
DQ Read 694
DQ Write 403
DQ Mixed 518
394% 538 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 284%
Great: 425%
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 512GB-$290
270GB free
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1399 1486 1484 1485 1482 1479 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 942
Write 528
Mixed 849
SusWrite 1,469
214% 947 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 73.1
4K Mixed 42
150% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 556
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 452
333% 444 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 193%
Great: 241%
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 512GB-$290
432GB free
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 525 1445 1506 1507 1507 1506 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1,487
Write 1,493
Mixed 987
SusWrite 1,333
298% 1,325 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 48.9
162% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 563
DQ Write 375
DQ Mixed 453
342% 464 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 212%
Great: 241%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
405GB free
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1417 1431 1431 1431 1431 1431 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 1,917
Write 1434
Mixed 774
SusWrite 1,428
310% 1,388 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 86.3
4K Mixed 51.8
180% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 789
DQ Write 401
DQ Mixed 452
374% 547 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 246%
Great: 283%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965600-012.A02G 9965600-012.A02G 9965600-012.A02G 9965600-012.A02G 9965600-011.A01G 9965600-011.A01G 9965600-011.A01G 9965600-011.A01G 128GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
133% Outstanding
MC Read 60.5
MC Write 54.1
MC Mixed 49.1
156% 54.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 16.6
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 133%
This bench: 133%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E-10G WS Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus X99-E-10G WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,154
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback