Hyrican H110M PRO-VH PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHyrican H110M PRO-VH PLUS  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI H110M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7A15)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161115
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 30 '20 at 06:43
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$68
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 74.3
1-Core 91.6
2-Core 194
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 337
42% 321 Pts
64-Core 348
22% 348 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.3% Poor
Lighting 36.4
Reflection 28.5
Parallax 34.9
30% 33.3 fps
MRender 36.3
Gravity 35.9
Splatting 33.5
29% 35.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.8
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 413
Write 310
Mixed 280
74% 335 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 54.5
4K Mixed 10.5
75% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 17.4
46% 96.6 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 83%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
227GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 141 144 145 146 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 152
Write 160
Mixed 38
SusWrite 144
89% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 107%
Seagate Expansion+ Desk 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 178 179 182 183 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 133
Write 162
Mixed 97.5
SusWrite 175
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.8
355% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 97%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
931GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 34.7
Write 33.7
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 36.2
39% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.7
38% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS8213.C8FBD1 859B CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBR2 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
64.7% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 20.7
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 18.5
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M PRO-VH PLUS Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Hyrican H110M PRO-VH PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $127
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback