ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 1095CD9

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	58.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Lenovo 1095CD9 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	52.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170327
Uptime	9.9 Days
Run Date	Aug 30 '20 at 02:22
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2643 0 1,437 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	62% Good	Memory 59.2 1-Core 89.8 2-Core 179 60% 109 Pts	4-Core 348 8-Core 620 58% 484 Pts	64-Core 888 55% 888 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Zotac(19DA 1438) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	58.8% Above average	Lighting 72.9 Reflection 75.7 Parallax 65.9 59% 71.5 fps	MRender 70.7 Gravity 68.7 Splatting 71.2 58% 70.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 227 199 162 94 63 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	65.3% Good	Read 249 Write 223 Mixed 230 SusWrite 158 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 52.5 4K Mixed 36.9 119% 39.5 MB/s	DQ Read 190 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 124 111% 168 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 134%
WD WD4002FFWX-68TZ4N0 4TB 829 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2GB free Firmware: 0A83 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 151 Write 156 Mixed 77.3 95% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 0.8 229% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 114%
WD WD4002FFWX-68TZ4N0 4TB 829 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2GB free Firmware: 0A83 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 113 Write 118 Mixed 55.8 71% 95.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 0.6 188% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 114%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1GB free Firmware: 0A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 76.3 Write 74.3 Mixed 62.3 53% 71 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.4 78% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 87%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$182 20,205 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 0GB free Firmware: 1A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 59.3 Write 114 Mixed 72 61% 81.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.4 87% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36JSF1G72PZ-1 8x8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	MC Read 35.8 MC Write 31.9 MC Mixed 30.3 93% 32.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 4.4 22% 7.8 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 130%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback