Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	24.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2 (all builds)
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161207
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 29 '20 at 19:57
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 870K 2,094 User benchmarks, average bench 46% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Memory 78.4 1-Core 70.5 2-Core 128 57% 92.4 Pts	4-Core 226 8-Core 227 30% 227 Pts	64-Core 214 13% 214 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90 64,240 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Sapphire(174B E344) CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	24.3% Poor	Lighting 28.8 Reflection 32.2 Parallax 35.4 24% 32.1 fps	MRender 30.9 Gravity 27.9 Splatting 34.6 26% 31.1 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: P190710b SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 146 153 160 169 163 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Read 336 Write 294 Mixed 264 SusWrite 155 59% 262 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 47.5 4K Mixed 26.1 95% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 21.1 DQ Write 59.3 DQ Mixed 27.6 25% 36 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 101%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 28GB free Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 153 155 161 169 163 MB/s Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.9% Average	Read 200 Write 90.4 Mixed 71.4 SusWrite 159 29% 130 MB/s	4K Read 12.1 4K Write 58.1 4K Mixed 30 88% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 24.5 DQ Write 73 DQ Mixed 35 31% 44.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 100%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 7GB free Firmware: R0105A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 414 Write 348 Mixed 13.7 57% 259 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 7.8 4K Mixed 12.9 57% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GBH1X04H1BB3 2x4GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2132 MHz Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	40.4% Average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 8.2 MC Mixed 16.5 40% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 12.8 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 83.5 48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-F2A68HM-DS2 Builds (Compare 290 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2

CPU
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	49x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	26x
A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples	25x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	32x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	19x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	16x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	10x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	8x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 4,775 samples	12x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	8x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 7,567 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16