MSI B75MA-E33 (MS-7808)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics77.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive45% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7808
MotherboardMSI B75MA-E33 (MS-7808)  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130930
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateAug 29 '20 at 11:29
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$30
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 99.9
2-Core 200
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 378
50% 373 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
PNY(196E 1349) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3650 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Lighting 97
Reflection 88
Parallax 83.8
79% 89.6 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 80.6
Splatting 79.3
75% 94.5 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ldlc F7 PLUS 3D NAND 240GB
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1024A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 31 32 38 39 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
45% Average
Read 435
Write 82.7
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 37.4
32% 148 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 1.8
79% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 17
DQ Mixed 17.6
31% 66.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45%
Great: 89%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
30GB free
Firmware: GG2OACY0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 56 56 56 57 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 82.8
Write 76
Mixed 32
SusWrite 55.9
45% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PLEXHDer9.A01LF 0080 PLEXHDer 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.3% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 18.5
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 16.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75MA-E33 (MS-7808) Builds (Compare 898 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI B75MA-E33 (MS-7808) - $58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $383
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback