LG *P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLG *P  (all builds)
MotherboardMICRO-STAR MS-7241
Memory1.6 GB free of 2.5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '20 at 08:02
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 6420-$190
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
39% Below average
Memory 70.8
1-Core 24.1
2-Core 42.9
34% 45.9 Pts
4-Core 45
8-Core 47.1
6% 46 Pts
64-Core 46
3% 46 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 39%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel G965 Express Chipset Family
Device(1854 800D) 384MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2697
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
0.22% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.19
Parallax 0.38
0% 0.32 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.22%
Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.06H05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 29 53 53 55 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 57.1
Write 45.9
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 46.4
35% 47.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.4
93% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 59%
ST500DM0 02-1ER14C 500GB
466GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.5% Very poor
Read 28.3
Write 24.4
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 25.8
34% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
81% 1.03 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2GB
null MHz
512, 512, 512, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 4.3
13% 4.47 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.33 GB/s
Latency 99.5
40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical *P Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: LG *P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $190
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback