Gigabyte GA-Z270P-D3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	73.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	319% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z270P-D3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z270P-D3-CF (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171108
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 27 '20 at 22:41
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	90.6% Outstanding	Memory 91.4 1-Core 133 2-Core 259 90% 161 Pts	4-Core 483 8-Core 743 76% 613 Pts	64-Core 716 44% 716 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 90.6% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% EVGA(3842 1167) CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 2450 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Lighting 94 Reflection 88.1 Parallax 80.3 77% 87.5 fps	MRender 84.4 Gravity 81.5 Splatting 79.8 67% 81.9 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 428GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1805 1083 812 814 812 801 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	319% Outstanding	Read 2,560 Write 2,393 Mixed 1,743 SusWrite 1,021 432% 1,929 MB/s	4K Read 66.8 4K Write 170 4K Mixed 91.2 308% 109 MB/s	DQ Read 1,434 DQ Write 1,216 DQ Mixed 1,312 986% 1,321 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 319% Great: 355%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 326GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 21 26 26 55 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	23.3% Poor	Read 44 Write 56.3 Mixed 30.1 SusWrite 36.8 31% 41.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 109% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB 122,822 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	73% Very good	MC Read 27.5 MC Write 27.8 MC Mixed 21.4 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 28.6 SC Mixed 21.7 65% 22.7 GB/s	Latency 65.1 62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z270P-D3-CF Builds (Compare 2,440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 46%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270P-D3-CF

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	668x
Core i5-7600KIntel $184Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	382x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	275x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	256x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	243x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	211x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	61x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $51Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	60x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	56x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	103x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	74x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	44x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $486

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16